Search results for "Object and relational categories"

showing 1 items of 1 documents

Do typically and atypically developing children learn and generalize novel names similarly: The role of conceptual distance during learning and at te…

2020

International audience; There is a large body of evidence showing that comparison of multiple stimuli leads to better conceptualization and generalization of novel names than no-comparison settings in typically developing (TD) children. By contrast, the evidence regarding this issue remains scarce in children with intellectual disabilities (ID). Children with intellectual disabilities (ID) and TD children matched on mental age with the Raven's coloured progressive matrices were tested in several novel name learning comparison conditions, with familiar objects. We manipulated the conceptual distance between the learning stimuli in the learning phase and between the learning and generalizatio…

030506 rehabilitationIntellectual disabilities03 medical and health sciencesRaven's Progressive MatricesCognitionComparisonsGeneralization (learning)Intellectual DisabilityIntellectual disabilityDevelopmental and Educational PsychologymedicineHumansLearningNames0501 psychology and cognitive sciencesCognitive skill10. No inequalityChildMental ageIntelligence TestsConceptualization4. Education05 social sciencesmedicine.diseaseObject and relational categoriesClinical PsychologyLanguage developmentCategorization[SCCO.PSYC]Cognitive science/Psychology0305 other medical sciencePsychologyConceptual distance050104 developmental & child psychologyCognitive psychologyResearch in developmental disabilities
researchProduct